Comments on: Rush Hour 3 http://starseeker.com/2007-movies/rush-hour-3/ Just another WordPress weblog Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:05:18 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: billgates http://starseeker.com/2007-movies/rush-hour-3/comment-page-1/#comment-34 billgates Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:47:22 +0000 http://reviews.starseeker.com/2007/05/15/rush-hour-3/#comment-34 Rush Hour 2 was terrible, Chris Tucker was unwatchable. Tucker and Chan are going to bring down the Triad by themselves, in Rush Hour 3? Really? I mean, is this the premise? I wonder how many people will actually pay to see this movie? Rush Hour 2 was terrible, Chris Tucker was unwatchable. Tucker and Chan are going to bring down the Triad by themselves, in Rush Hour 3? Really? I mean, is this the premise? I wonder how many people will actually pay to see this movie?

]]> By: ABBA http://starseeker.com/2007-movies/rush-hour-3/comment-page-1/#comment-33 ABBA Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:26:13 +0000 http://reviews.starseeker.com/2007/05/15/rush-hour-3/#comment-33 Rush Hour 2 wasn't bad enough, we have to have another one thrown at us? Yeah, we get it. Jackie Chan and Tucker are very different, and from opposite sides of the world. It was funny the first time, boring the second time, so what can they deliver for a third time? Is Tucker going to explain to Chan how we call it "Rice" instead of "Wice"? Rush Hour 2 wasn’t bad enough, we have to have another one thrown at us? Yeah, we get it. Jackie Chan and Tucker are very different, and from opposite sides of the world. It was funny the first time, boring the second time, so what can they deliver for a third time?

Is Tucker going to explain to Chan how we call it “Rice” instead of “Wice”?

]]>